Big-Nosed Murder Monkeys?
A bill just passed in the House would make it difficult to discuss Israel’s crimes against humanity.
The Christo-Fascist Party (formerly Republican) and the Dumb-shit-o-crats (the Zionist-owned arm of the Democratic Party) have come together in the egregiously crooked, money-grubbing U.S. House to approve by a wide margin special treatment for those oh-so-special people, the chosen of God, namely the filthy fucking Zionists currently mass-murdering innocent Palestinians.
The bill is aimed at American institutions of higher education, but its poorly thought-out “rules” could easily be applied across our entire government.
So much for the First Amendment, you ordinary, stupid American fucking losers. You fucking ignorant peasants in all 50 states who merely stand by, sucking your whatevers, as basic American freedom is cancelled by your own dipshit elected representatives, or mis-representatives. Sure, stab us in the back to help the Zionists murder more people, Congress! What do we care - we’re happy, fat, stupid American fucks. Hahahaha!
Under this bill, now headed to the utterly corrupt, Zionist billionaire-owned-and-operated U.S. Senate, American citizens will likely eventually be held accountable, presumably by various U.S. agencies and in various domestic situations, if they violate what this evil bill vaguely defines as “antisemitic.”
“Vaguely,” because the legislation leaves the actual definition of antisemitism to that published by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) on May 26, 2016. And no, we don’t know who elected those fucks.
But we found this stuff on the IHRA website:
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
1. Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
2. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
3. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
4. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
5. Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
6. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
7. Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
8. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
9. Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
10. Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
11. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
Nominally then, this bill allows for criticism of the State of Israel, but only if the criticism is “similar to that leveled against any other country”- whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean. And we don’t dare compare Zionists mass-murdering Palestinians with Nazis and what happened to Jews in the Holocaust because, well, somehow, that was different. Special maybe?
This is appalling enough but note also how the IHRA “rules” strive mightily to equate Judaism and Jews with the State of Israel, leaving open the likelihood Israel’s critics will be prosecuted, no matter what.
This is all just insidious bullshit. And completely unamerican.
Nevertheless, if this utterly crappy bill passes the Senate, Americans will simply have to be more careful with the terms they use. And that’s actually a good thing. Because only bigots hate “Jews.”
Generally speaking, that is.
But for the moment at least, intelligent and perceptive people - many of whom are Jews - can certainly hate “Zionism” and “Zionists,” whom they wish to see utterly defeated.
And some of them at least don’t give a shit what happens to the State of Israel itself. They could care less. That is to say, they really don’t fucking care - there’s a cold, dark, empty spot where Israel used to be in their brains. But if this bill becomes law, they wouldn’t be able to tell you precisely why they have no feelings towards Israel one way or the other. Do you see what we’re getting at?
Or are the evil Zionists going to mandate that we all love and adore Israel?
In other words, what we’re arguing for here is: Hate the sin of Zionism, which is a nationalistic political movement and definitely not an ancient religion. Also hate the mass-murdering Zionists, who are neither necessarily Jews nor citizens of Israel. In other words, they are followers of a highly specific, nasty and brutish cult of murderous fascism called Zionism - a purely political movement.
Adopting this precision in our use of language will make the real issue crystal-clear:
Our Zionist overlords are currently exerting their superior Judeo-fascist power over the U.S. They have ordered their servants in the groveling and traitorous U.S. Christo-Fascist Party, as well as their obsequious, running-dog Dumb-shit-o-crats, to give them special treatment.
Corrupt U.S. pols and academic bureaucrats - sell-outs all - are the ones oppressing peaceful demonstrators at the behest of America’s Zionist billionaire masters, just as they now wish to directly oppress the American people themselves..
See? Not a single anti-Semitic word in that whole mini-screed. Because it’s all political.
Of course, the Zionists, who seemingly forever now have been relentlessly trying to conflate Jews, Judaism and every flavor of Jewish culture whatsoever with the State of Israel, will argue the term “Zionist,” is what amounts to their copyrighted property and therefore is clearly “Jewish” under this bill.
It’s true - the term "Zionist" originated from the word "Zion," which appears in Ye Olde Testicle and refers to Jerusalem and the Land of Israel. The term "Zionism," however, was coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1890 to describe the nationalist movement supporting the establishment and protection of a Jewish homeland or state in Palestine.
So we’re on somewhat solid ground there.
However, if the corrupt courts do force us to give up that term because of the historic precedent, even though we’re using “Zionist” in a purely political context, then the only alternative - assuming we haven’t been thrown in jail already - is to make up our own word.
How about, oh, I don’t know,
Big-nosed murder monkeys? The murderous Schnozzles? Circumcised serial killers? Schmutzes ‘n’ putzes?
Yeah, we’ll keep working on it…